Night Stalker Detective

21 Responses

1. jinenglish68 Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 3:25 am

   all part of God’s plan.
   References :

2. Killthabat Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 3:52 am

   You lost me at "what do creationists think…"
   References :

3. belle Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 4:03 am

   I think it’s a great tool. Why do you ask?
   References :

4. 808 Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 4:28 am

   i am glad DNA evidence was "created"….
   References :

5. Yun Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 5:10 am

   The Bible says nothing against that nor does the belief in creation…

   Despite what some people seem to think, we don’t have a problem with the use of science.
   References :

6. Bene Esse Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 5:33 am

   Jesus said: Obey the law. Fail to see how he’d have a problem with the enforcement of it.
   References :

7. Anton Mathew Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 5:52 am

   I don’t understand what Creation has to do with Solving Crimes.
   References :

8. Goalie Geetar Grl Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 5:59 am

   If anything it should be embraced?? Why wouldn’t it be?
   References :

9. Bluto Blutarsky49 Says:
   November 29th, 2009 at 6:26 am

   the christians only know what they learn from tv cop shows "ser if therse dern cops cen catch criminels orkay with thet newfangled cempewter steff",

   the preists hate it because it increases chances of thier conviction.
   References :

10. psychorabbit15 Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 6:50 am

    I’m sorry… your attempted implications of this question just blew a fuse out in my logic box. Give me a second to replace it.

    ……………………

    Okay. Do what now? I don’t think DNA disproves the bible. Is the head of all C.S.I. arguing with the church now, somehow?
    References :

11. Vishal Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 7:35 am

    I’m guessing they don’t believe that DNA can be used to determine common descent, so paternity tests and the like don’t count for anything.
    References :

12. chelschubz Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    what you think because i don’t agree with macro evolution that I must not approve of anything that has to do with science and ……heaven forbid… DNA?????

    Oh come on, cut us some slack, we aren’t all that thick headed. Do you think christians would rather give birth out in the woods as well?

    I think using DNA in evidence is a great advancement for law enforcement. I see it as more proof how wonderful God made our minds.
    References :

13. Frulee22 Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    I think it’s great. And should be used. But what does this have to do with creationists?
    References :

14. Little Lilly Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    So you think people don’t believe in DNA?
    and you call them delusional
    References :

15. Jeancommunicates Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    I think it is wonderful and so does God. DNA has brought us one step closer to God. That cell that will not divide is called "Eve." We can all be traced back to one woman.

    It is another example of God giving us information so evil will be brought out into the open. God will always expose evil.
    References :

16. Tzadiq Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    I think I don’t understand the question?

    Do you think that because we don’t believe in the creation myth of evolution we don’t believe in DNA?

    DNA, Doesn’t that insure that we will keep making the same species over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over………….

    Obviously you don’t know your own science better go take biology 101 again.
    References :

17. Zarathustra Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    The problem with questions like this is that no matter how good your argument you can’t change their minds, it’s like they’re all so brainwashed into, what is essentially, a ludicrous, nonsensical theory that they can’t see the forest for the trees.

    Also, when your basis for argument is based in god, you can make up any old sh*t and it’s classed as a valid answer to the question. Funny how they’re always challenging atheists and claiming they have no proof of anything. Bit of the pot calling the kettle black about all that…

    As an aside, I would’ve really hoped someone who believes in it could have come up with a better answer than "it’s all part of gods plan." Seriously, is there anything that can’t be explained away by claiming divine intervention…
    References :

18. ~Sophia~ Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 11:49 am

    Not sure. The Human Genome Project leader is a Christian, though, and he doesn’t seem to have a problem reconciling his beliefs with his science.

    There is a way to look at science as explaining how God did things, and not contradicting the idea that God did them. More people should look into it.
    References :
    agnostic/deist

19. Top Contributor Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    There is nothing in the DNA evidence against Creationism.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2679979886246414114&q=genes+of+genesis&ei=xPoqSOnqIYr2rQLU9ciNCg
    References :

20. Capt. Cook was Luaued! Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    Um, I don’t know if I qualify as a creationist but I think it’s great and makes good TV shows. Viva la CSIs!
    References :

21. Sly Fox Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    First of all, this is a very good question.

    Just examining the results (answers) it would seem that there is some kind of selective process going on, a clear indication that selection takes place naturally within the study group!

    Now the question is, Is this Intelligently designed on the part of those in Question?
    The yes answer would be much more worrying than that of the case of pure random choice involving no intelligence!

    It’s all a little Ironic really.

    SORRY I just took a look at the Video by Top Con… two places above me.

    Well does that just prove everything the ‘Genes is’

    Please it’s a word from Latin claiming anything mystical about the connection is a little lame!

    O.E., from L. genesis, adopted as title of first book of Old Testament in Vulgate, from Gk. genesis "origin, creation, generation," from gignesthai "to be born," related to genos "race, birth, descent" (see genus). As such, it translated Heb. bereshith, lit. "in the beginning," which was the first word of the text, taken in error as its title. Extended sense of "origin, creation" first recorded in Eng. 1604.

    And the Word Gene was chosen because it comes from the same "ROOT"
    References :

Leave a Comment